The Movement for the Self-Determination of Kabylie (MAK) orchestrated a meticulously planned, clandestine operation in the heart of Paris to stage its symbolic declaration of independence. The event’s location—the Hoche Salons in the 8th arrondissement—was only revealed to participants less than two hours before its scheduled start on December 14th. This last-minute disclosure was a direct response to a French prefectural order that banned the ceremony at the initially planned Versailles Convention Center, citing risks to public order. The move underscores the intense sensitivity surrounding the issue, forcing the event into a private venue under the watchful eyes of French law enforcement, who deployed officers to control access to the avenue.
While the MAK framed the event as a historic “independence declaration ceremony,” its practical scope remains purely symbolic. The Algerian state, which constitutionally enshrines the unity and indivisibility of its national territory, vehemently opposes any project for Kabylie’s self-determination. This Berber-majority region, located east of Algiers and home to an estimated 10-12 million people (nearly 20% of Algeria’s population), has a long history of cultural and political distinctiveness. The declaration from Paris, therefore, represents a strategic act of political theater aimed at the international community rather than an immediate challenge to Algerian sovereignty on the ground.
Classified as a Terrorist Organization
The Algerian government’s reaction, communicated through pro-regime media and diplomatic channels, has been one of stern vigilance and offense. As MAK official Mourad Amellal noted, the declaration project “greatly offended the authorities in Algeria.” The MAK claims to have formally notified Algiers of its intentions, sending letters to both the presidential palace (El-Mouradia) and the Algerian embassy in Paris during the summer, but received no official response. This silence speaks volumes, reflecting a strategy of non-recognition that aims to deprive the movement of legitimacy and avoid elevating its status through direct engagement.
The context for this declaration is deeply rooted in decades of struggle. Kabylie has been a focal point of Berber (Amazigh) cultural rights activism since the “Berber Spring” of 1980. Tensions escalated dramatically following the 2001 “Black Spring,” where protests were met with a harsh government crackdown. The MAK, founded by the exiled former leader of the Kabylie-based political party RCD, Ferhat Mehenni, has evolved from advocating for regional autonomy to explicitly seeking independence, a shift accelerated by the Hirak protest movement of 2019 and the Algerian government’s continued centralization of power. The choice of Paris as a stage is strategic; it leverages France’s large Kabyle diaspora and attempts to internationalize a dispute that Algiers insists is a purely internal matter.
For France, the event presented a delicate diplomatic dilemma. By allowing the ceremony to proceed in a private venue after banning it in a public one, French authorities navigated a narrow path between upholding the right to assembly and avoiding actions that could be seen as endorsing separatism—a red line for Algeria, a key partner in energy and regional security. The heavy police presence served both to manage order and to visibly demonstrate state control over the proceedings. This incident highlights the ongoing friction in Franco-Algerian relations, where historical baggage, diaspora politics, and contemporary geopolitical interests continually intersect.
Ultimately, the MAK’s Paris declaration is less about enacting a functional state and more about performing statehood to sustain a long-term campaign. It seeks to keep the Kabylie question on the international agenda, mobilize the diaspora, and challenge the narrative of Algerian national unity. However, without significant military capability, recognition from other states, or a decisive shift in the internal dynamics of Algeria, the path from symbolic declaration in a Parisian salon to tangible independence remains fraught with immense political and practical obstacles. The event is a potent reminder that in the 21st century, independence movements wage battles not only on home terrain but also on the stages of global capitals and in the realm of international perception.