The Political Funding Audit in Mali: A Deep Dive into Systemic Failures and Democratic Erosion

For over two decades, the Malian state has injected tens of billions of CFA francs into the political system to fund political parties. A landmark six-month audit by the Supreme Court’s Audit Section has now pulled back the curtain, revealing a landscape marred by severe financial irregularities and a troubling over-reliance on public money. The public release of these findings on December 29th marks a critical moment for accountability, yet it occurs within a profoundly altered and contentious political environment.

A Forensic Examination of Two Decades of Public Funding

The final audit, covering the period from 2000 to 2024, was initiated by a Prime Ministerial referral in May 2025. This move followed recommendations from national consultations, positioning the audit as a cornerstone effort to scrutinize the financial governance of Mali’s political class. The principle behind public funding is sound: political parties perform a public service by engaging citizens, educating voters, and structuring democratic choice. State subsidies, drawn from tax revenues, are intended to recognize this role and create a level playing field, reducing dependency on opaque private interests.

An Audit Conducted in a Legal Vacuum

However, this audit unfolded in a uniquely challenging context. In a decisive and controversial move, political party activities were suspended and then the parties themselves were dissolved by decree in May 2025. This action repealed the foundational 2005 Charter of Political Parties. Consequently, auditors faced a significant hurdle: a near-total lack of cooperation from the entities under review. Many parties declared they no longer possessed premises or functional accounting records, crippling the audit’s depth from the outset.

The Audit Section attempted to adhere to the adversarial principle, broadcasting an invitation on ORTM for parties to collect their provisional reports. Of the 295 parties that existed before dissolution, only 35 collected their documents, and a mere 15 submitted any form of response. This environment of non-collaboration underscores the report’s findings as a minimum baseline of irregularities, with the full scale of mismanagement likely being even greater.

Key Findings: A System of Opacity and Excess

The audit’s revelations paint a picture of a funding system operating with minimal transparency and accountability.

Financial Discrepancies and Missing Billions

The core numbers are staggering. While 144 parties submitted accounts showing total resources of 42.1 billion CFA francs, the state’s records indicate it disbursed 25.98 billion in direct aid. However, the parties themselves only declared receiving 24.62 billion of that aid—a discrepancy of over 1.3 billion CFA francs unaccounted for. Furthermore, the justification for 3.15 billion CFA francs in declared resources lacked any supporting documentation.

Overwhelming Dependence on State Funds

The audit confirms a critical weakness in Malian political life: extreme financial dependence on the state. Public aid constituted 58.4% of total party resources and a staggering 147.9% of their own, internally-generated resources. This means parties were, on average, entirely reliant on state handouts, with public funds far exceeding anything they could raise independently. This creates a perverse incentive structure, tethering political survival to government favor rather than popular support.

Concentration of Wealth and Illegal Practices

This funding was not distributed equitably. Just 13 political parties captured over 82% of all public aid, with major players like ADEMA-PASJ (5.857 billion CFAF), RPM (5.456 billion CFAF), and URD (3.617 billion CFAF) receiving the lion’s share. The audit also uncovered illegal practices, including parties taking out bank loans—a funding source not permitted by law—and receiving donations without declaring them to the supervising ministry.

State Complicity: The Government’s Role in the Breakdown

The report is unequivocal in assigning blame not just to the parties, but to the state apparatus itself. The Ministry of Economy and Finance failed to provide proof that unallocated aid balances—totaling 2.17 billion CFA francs—were ever returned to the Public Treasury. More damningly, the audit found that a 2019 allocation of 2.954 billion CFA francs had no legal basis, as no distribution decree was issued. The government is also faulted for distributing nearly 14 billion CFA francs to parties between 2013 and 2018, a period when the country was grappling with a severe multidimensional crisis and acute budgetary constraints.

Broader Implications: Beyond the Missing Money

The implications of this audit extend far beyond financial mismanagement. It reveals a systemic failure that erodes democratic foundations:

• Accountability Void: The inability to track funds undermines public trust and makes a mockery of electoral competition.
• Shallow Democracy: When parties are financially dependent on the state, their role as government watchdogs is fundamentally compromised.
• Institutional Memory Loss: The dissolution of parties and loss of records represent a catastrophic break in political continuity, harming future democratic development.

Recommendations and the Path Forward

The Audit Section’s recommendations—strengthening control mechanisms, clarifying leadership responsibilities, and improving transparency—are necessary but insufficient given the scale of the collapse. True reform would require:

1. Re-establishing a Clear Legal Framework: Any future party system must be built on a robust, transparent charter with strict auditing requirements.
2. Building Independent Oversight: Creating an autonomous electoral commission with real power to audit and sanction.
3. Promoting Grassroots Funding: Incentivizing small-donor contributions to reduce systemic dependence on state coffers.

The audit of political funding in Mali is more than a financial post-mortem; it is a stark diagnosis of a democratic system that lost its way. The billions in unaccounted funds symbolize a deeper crisis of accountability and purpose. As Mali navigates its future, rebuilding a transparent, accountable, and genuinely competitive political finance system will be a cornerstone of any legitimate democratic renewal. The findings of this report must serve not as an endpoint, but as a non-negotiable baseline for what must change.

Analysis based on the original reporting by Sikou Bah and the Supreme Court Audit Report.

---